Search Results for "Interest Disallowance"

230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.

A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Material as Original Assessment is Invalid as Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Geopreneur Realty Private Limited, a real estate development company, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2021 issued under Section 148...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Remands Matter to Tribunal for Fresh Consideration on Input Tax Credit Disallowance. The court held that the Tribunal must decide appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them without examining the grounds raised by the assessee.

The petitioner, M/s. Manasa Electricals Co., is a trader in electrical goods. For the assessment year 2005-06, the petitioner filed KVAT returns in Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Section 264 Application in Income Tax Case — Holds Section 179(1) Order Against Legal Heirs Requires Proper Application of Mind. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits and Not Reject Application Mechanically Under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioners, Manjula D. Rita and Bhavya D. Rita, are two of the four legal heirs of the deceased Dinesh Shamji Rita, who was a director of a compa...