Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

438 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Additional Collector's Order Condoning Delay in Filing Election Expense Accounts Under Section 14B of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. The Court Held That the Additional Collector Has Power to Consider Good Reason for Delay and That a 15-Day Delay Due to Non-Provision of Forms by Returning Officer Constitutes Good Reason.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Shakti Balkrishna Mhatre, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 12 November 2014 passed by the Additional Collector, Raigad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Village Panchayat Members Challenging Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Mere Registration of Forest Offence Without Conviction Does Not Attract Disqualification.

28 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Raju s/o Mansaram Pawar and his wife Yashoda w/o Raju Pawar, were elected members of the Village Panchayat, Jamdighat, in 2017. Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Mere Relationship with Employed Son Not Sufficient for Disqualification. The court held that natural love and affection for a son does not constitute a disqualifying interest in employment under Section 14(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1948.

11 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Sau. Dhrupadabai Laxmanrao Mhaske, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Shelu (Bk), Yavatmal. By Resolution No. 12 dated 23.06.2011, th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch and Members in Gram Panchayat Dispute — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Removal Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Charges and Inquiry Was Conducted Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

1 Apr 2019

The petitioners, who were the elected Sarpanch, Upsarpanch and members of Gram Panchayat Kolhigolhar, were removed from office by an order dated 22-03...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Order of Additional Divisional Commissioner in Village Panchayat Disqualification Case for Want of Reasons; Holds Cryptic Order Arbitrary. Quasi-Judicial Authority's Order Setting Aside Collector's Decision Without Recording Reasons Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Is Unsustainable.

12 Sep 2018

The dispute arose from a disqualification proceeding initiated against the petitioner, a former Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Lohgaon. The petitioner ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Election Petitions Challenging Election of MP from Davanagere Constituency on Grounds of Disqualification under Section 9A of Representation of People Act, 1951 and Corrupt Practices. Petitioners Allege Acceptance of Nomination Paper Was Improper as Returned Candidate Had Subsisting Contract with Government Through His Employee, and Voters Were Subjected to Undue Influence.

16 Jan 2014

The judgment pertains to two election petitions filed under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 by electors of 13 Davanagere Lok ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Tahsildar as Administrator of Village Panchayat. Court holds that Additional Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to appoint Administrator without dissolution or expiry of term of elected body under Section 55 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

17 Mar 2020

The petitioners, who were elected members of the Gram Panchayat Parewadi, challenged the order dated 17/02/2020 passed by the Additional Commissioner,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grampanchayat Resolution and Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute. Court upholds validity of resolution and order, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, twelve residents of Sangav, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Sarpanch Reservation Process in Gram Panchayats Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. District-Level Reservation Overrides Tahsildar's Preliminary Decision; No Vested Right for Candidates Based on Earlier Unfinalized Reservation.

17 Jan 2006

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by two women elected members of Matond Gram Panchayat from the open category, challe...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)