Search Results for "Equitable recovery"

834 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 834 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Interest Act, 1978 and Article 226 of Constitution Invoked to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...