Search Results for "Environmental compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Environmental compliance"

451 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.

5 May 2006

The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates on Transfer of Forest Clearance Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Extension of Letter of Intent. Petitioners challenged show-cause notices and refusal to transfer forest clearance, invoking Supreme Court order in Samaja Parivartana Samudaya and Section 8B of MMDR Act.

27 Sep 2023

The matter involved three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...

High Court

KAHC010068412019_1

16 Aug 2019

...

High Court

KAHC010479002008_1

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking National Plan Under Disaster Management Act for COVID-19 Pandemic. Existing National Disaster Management Plan and Funds Held Sufficient for Pandemic Response.

18 Aug 2020

The writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the Union of India to p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Timely Filling of Vacancies in Information Commissions to Ensure Effective Implementation of Right to Information Act, 2005. The Court held that the right to information is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) and that vacancies in Information Commissions must be filled promptly to prevent backlogs and ensure transparency.

15 Feb 2019

This Public Interest Litigation was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking effective implementation of the Right to Information A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

5 Dec 2014

The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Metro Line 4 Alignment and Land Acquisition by Private Landowners. Petitioners Contend That MMRDA Lacks Authority Under Metro Railways Act, 1978 and That Acquisition Under MRTP Act Is Invalid Without Environmental Clearances.

30 Mar 2023

Two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the implementation and alignment of Metro Railway Line No.4 (ML-4) in Mumbai. P...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)