Search Results for "Employees Provident Funds Act"

327 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 327 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Government Orders on Full Wage Payment During Lockdown Under Disaster Management Act. Employers Must Pay Full Wages to Workers During COVID-19 Lockdown Period, Section 10(2)(l) of Disaster Management Act, 2005 Valid.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions filed by employers and employers' associations challenging the constitutional validity of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Correctness of Century Textile Interpretation on 'Unprotected Worker' Under Maharashtra Mathadi Act. Referred Question Seeks to Determine Whether Only Casually Engaged Workers Are Covered by the Act Under Section 2(11).

The Bombay High Court Full Bench was constituted to resolve a conflict arising from differing interpretations of Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Math...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Dismissed Bus Conductor in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's finding that punishment of dismissal was proportionate to misconduct of ticket irregularities upheld as not shockingly disproportionate.

The petitioner, Shivaji Daulat Dadar, was employed as a Bus Conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 1989. On 13 ...