Search Results for "Collector permission"

1738 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1738 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Government Order Denying Regrant to Dalit Allottee in Watan Land Dispute. Occupancy Price Paid within Prescribed Period under Bombay Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1958 Entities Allottee to Regrant as Authorised Holder.

The dispute arose from a claim for regrant of service inam watan lands under the Bombay Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1958. Originally, the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Notice of Motion for Interim Eviction of Non-Cooperating Members in Housing Society Redevelopment. The Court examines the Society's plea under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 for mandatory orders against members who refuse to vacate despite a majority resolution.

Background: The matter arises from a suit filed by Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., a cooperative housing society registered under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Order Directing Collector to Treat Writ Petition as Representation. Court held that the order was complied with by the Collector's decision, and no willful disobedience was established.

The petitioners, Thaksen Waman Davale and others, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including Subhas D. Sonawane and others, wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment for Temple Construction — No Public Interest Violation Found. Court held that allotment of land for a temple under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not require public auction and is permissible for religious purposes.

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Bapu Shankar Dighe and Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar, challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...