Search Results for "Coercive Recovery"

213 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 213 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications Seeking Police Investigation Against Former Mayor and Town Planner in Compensation Dispute. Court Holds That No Cognizable Offence Is Made Out and That the Magistrate's Direction to Treat the Application as a Complaint Was Proper.

The applicant, Atul Ashok Mundada, purchased two agricultural lands in Jalgaon for development. He claimed that the lands were acquired by the Jalgaon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Disconnection of Sick Industrial Company. Government's Communication to MSEDCL to Disconnect Supply Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Contrary to BIFR Directions.

The petitioner, Goradia Special Steels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, is a sick industrial company registered with the Boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MIDC to Distinguish Water Usage for Manufacturing vs. Allied Activities in Levy of Water Charges. The court held that MIDC cannot levy uniform higher water charges on industrial units without distinguishing between water used as raw material and water used for allied activities.

The petitioner, United Breweries Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging demand notices, water bills...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compensation for Pipeline Right of User Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipe-lines Act, 1962. Alternative Remedy of Appeal Available Under Section 11 of the Act Precludes Writ Jurisdiction.

The petitioners, Gas Authority of India Limited and another, filed a writ petition challenging the compensation determined by the Competent Authority ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Lenders Against Order Setting Aside Sale of Mortgaged Property Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Sale Was Not Conducted in a Fair and Transparent Manner and That the Borrower Was Not Given Adequate Notice of the Sale.

The case involves an appeal by a consortium of banks and a trustee company (the lenders) against an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) setting ...