Search Results for "Arbitration Act, 1940"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitration Act, 1940"

462 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Even After Award Rendered Beyond Statutory Time Limit -- Court Reverses High Court Decision Setting Aside Award

3 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, holding that a court can entertain an application under Section 29A(5) of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Holds that BSA governed by Benin law with foreign seat cannot be brought under Part I of Arbitration Act, and issue estoppel applies due to dismissal of anti-arbitration injunction.

30 Nov -0001

The Supreme Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by Balaji Steel Trade under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Union of India in Arbitration Dispute — Claim for Excess Timber Supply Held to Be Within Scope of Arbitration Clause. Recourse to Contract Necessary to Determine Claim, Confirming Arbitral Jurisdiction Under Arbitration Act, 1940.

25 Sep 1968

The appeal arose from a contract between the Union of India and Salween Timber Construction (India) for the supply of teak logs. A dispute emerged whe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Interim Injunction — No Error in Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion. The court held that the scope of appeal under Section 37 is limited and the arbitral tribunal's discretionary order under Section 17 cannot be interfered with unless perverse or capricious.

10 Jun 2022

The petitioner, AshokPalav Coop. Housing Society Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Share Transactions. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on unauthorized trades and liability of broker are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Kotak Securities Limited, a registered stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition - ONGC Challenges Umpire’s Award Granting Six Days’ Extension in Pipeline Project. Petition contends that the extension was granted in breach of contract clauses 5.9 and 41.8 and without evidence, after rejecting the related claim for cost of repairs.

12 Aug 2014

The dispute arose from a contract dated 6 November 1989 between Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) as employer and a consortium of foreign...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Partnership Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Strong Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief. Court held that disputes regarding partnership accounts and alleged mismanagement must be resolved through arbitration, not by appointing receiver at interim stage.

22 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Minochar @ Minoo Aspandyar Irani, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Petition for Foreign Award Citing Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Prior Section 34 Filing. Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Vests Exclusive Jurisdiction with the Court at Jamkhambalia Where the Section 34 Application Was First Filed.

20 Dec 2010

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Ihx (UK) Ltd., a company incorporated in England engaged in shipping, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitration award...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Distinction Between Section 34 of 1940 Act and Section 8 of 1996 Act Clarified. Order Referring Parties to Arbitration Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Consider Whether Dispute is Arbitrable and Whether Application Under Section 8 Was Maintainable After Filing Written Statement.

9 Oct 2015

The appellant, Sri G.R. Amarnath, filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the judgment and order dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

18 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)