Search Results for "water tariff"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BESCOM Demand Notices for Alleged Theft of Electricity Due to Lack of Evidence of Tampering. Meter found to be in working condition and no pilferage detected, demand set aside as arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vishwas Concrete Products Private Limited, is a company engaged in the business of running a concrete mixing industrial unit. It had t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Considers Second Appeals on Maintainability of Civil Suits Involving Electricity Tariff Dispute – Core Issue Is Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in the original suits, filed four separate suits (O.S. Nos. 613/2013, 612/2013, 610/2013, and 611/2013) before the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tax Classification Appeal -- 'Appellants Product' Held as Fruit Drink Under UPVAT Act -- Appellants Succeeds Against Commercial Tax Commissioner

The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by Appellants challenging the classification of their product under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Revocation of Electricity Duty Exemption for Educational Institutions by State Government. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Government Communication and Levy of Duty Under Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 1958; Court Issues Rule.

The petitioners, comprising 10 educational institutions managed by a charitable trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSEDCL's Challenge to CGRF Order Setting Aside Retrospective Subsidy Recovery. Retrospective Recovery of VM Subsidy Without Prior Notice Held Unjust Under MERC Regulations.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the final order dated 15.01.2025 passed by the Consume...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Sales Tax Levy on Steam at 10% — Steam Not a Chemical Under BST Act, 1959. The court held that steam is not a chemical in common parlance and the burden of proof on the assessee was not discharged.

The applicant, M/s Gopalanand Rasayan, a manufacturer of sulphuric acid and other chemicals, generated steam as a byproduct during manufacturing and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Power Supply Dispute Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Debt under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 not recoverable via winding up when substantial defense exists.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited, filed a company petition seeking winding up of the respondent, Global Energy Private Limited, under Section 433(e) of...