Search Results for "undivided shares"

269 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 269 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of oral agreement to transfer shares, finding no valid contract and no limitation bar.

The petitioner, Vijay Shivram Pathare, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award dated 30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Co-Owners. Agreement for Sale of Undivided Share by One Co-Owner Does Not Create a Right to Injunction Against Other Co-Owners Who Are Not Parties to the Agreement.

The appellant-plaintiff, M/s. Amoda Properties LLP, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 21st December 2016, whereby defendant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Based on Daughter's Inheritance Rights Under Pre-1956 Hindu Law. Property Deemed Self-Acquired, Daughter Inherits by Succession, Not Survivorship, Under Mitakshara Principles, Leading to Partition Decree for Appellants.

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by Thangammal, claiming a 1/5th share in properties originally owned by Marappa Gounder. The suit was di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Minor Children Seeking to Set Aside Family Settlement — Memorandum of Family Settlement Held Binding as a Family Arrangement Under Contract Act and Specific Relief Act

The plaintiffs, four children of Madhupati and Anuradha Singhania (Defendants 1 and 2), filed a suit seeking cancellation of a Memorandum of Family Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion for Interim Relief in Specific Performance Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Plaintiffs Failed to Make Out Prima Facie Case for Appointment of Receiver or Injunction.

The plaintiffs, M/s. Pride Associates and others, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 4th June 2005 for a property in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...