Search Results for "transferable development rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "transferable development rights"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BBMP Appeal Against Single Judge Order Directing Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction Under Section 321 of KMC Act. Contempt Petition Closed as Compliance Achieved During Pendency of Appeal.

15 Oct 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) against an order dated 29.05.2024 passed by a learned Single J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Arbitrator's Refusal of Interim Relief in Development Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in order denying interim injunction to developer under Development Agreement dated 3/2/2018.

5 Apr 2023

The petitioner, M/s Viraj Kamman Real Estate Developers Pvt Ltd, a real estate development company, entered into a Development Agreement dated 3/2/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Surrendered DP Road Land Despite No-Objection Condition. Transferable Development Rights cannot be denied merely because surrender was a condition of permission; entitlement arises from statutory scheme under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

4 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Cooperative Society, challenged a communication dated 22.09.2014 from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (Planning A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking TDR for Parking Lot Construction Under Development Control Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for constructing a separate parking lot building on municipal land as per DCR 33(9) read with DCR 34.

4 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Krishna Gopal Palande, filed a writ petition seeking a direction against the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to grant Transferabl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Writ Petition for TDR Against Construction of Development Plan Road. Municipal Corporation's Rejection of TDR Application Set Aside as Unreasonable and Contrary to Development Control Regulations.

15 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Siddhi Real Estate Developers, a partnership firm, constructed a development plan road at its own cost within the limits of Thane...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

8 Aug 2011

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)