Search Results for "toll collection contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "toll collection contract"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NHAI Appeal in Toll Collection Dispute — High Court Direction to Stop Toll Collection Set Aside. The Court held that toll collection on a completed section of a national highway is permissible under Rule 3(1) of the National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008, even if the entire project is not complete, and the deposited toll amount may be utilized by NHAI.

24 Jul 2024

The appeal was filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against the judgment of the High Court dated 05.04.2016, which allowed the wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation of Delhi's Petition Seeking Mandamus Against State of Maharashtra to Execute Distress Warrants. Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Has No Extra-Territorial Application, Hence No Duty on Maharashtra Authorities.

12 Jan 2024

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), a statutory body under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, filed a writ petition in the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Concession Agreement for Non-Payment of Revenue Share. Court upholds termination as valid under Article 21.2 of the Concession Agreement for failure to pay monthly revenue share, rejecting claims of force majeure and breach of contract by the respondent.

20 Aug 2022

The petitioners, MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd., Ozoneland Private Limited, Mrs. Anuya J. Mhaiskar, and Mr. Manoj Upadhyay, filed a writ petition ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Order Quashing Environmental Clearance for Peripheral Ring Road Due to Stale EIA Data. Primary Data Collected Over Three Years Before Submission Invalidates Clearance Under EIA Notification 2006.

17 Mar 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 February 2019 quashing the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted to the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Contractor's Petition and Dismisses State's Petitions in BOT Contract Dispute — Extension of Concession Period and Damages for Suspension of Toll Collection Upheld. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the BOT contract regarding extension of concession period and damages, finding no error apparent on the face of the award under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

12 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions arising from two arbitral awards under the Arbitration Act, 1940, relating to a Build, Operate and T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Contractor in BOT Toll Collection Dispute — Engineer's Recommendation for Extension Held Final and Conclusive. Court Allows Petitioner to Continue Collecting Toll Pending Section 34 Proceedings Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Subject to Undertaking to Repay with Interest.

26 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Atlanta Limited, a public limited company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Toll Collection Tender Dispute. Variation in Contract Period from 90 Weeks to 52 Weeks Constitutes Counter-Offer, Not Acceptance, Thus Forfeiture Invalid.

1 Apr 2014

The petitioner, M/s Abhay Construction, a partnership firm, submitted a tender to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. for collecti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).

28 Feb 2014

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Toll Road Tender and Concession Period. Policy decisions regarding toll collection and concession periods are not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Nandu Sambaji Nagarkar, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

17 Oct 2006

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)