Search Results for "ticket validity"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of E-Ticketing Contract, Directs Parties to Arbitration. Contractual disputes involving disputed questions of fact are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when an arbitration clause exists.

The Petitioner, a Private Limited Company, challenged the termination notice dated 13.06.2024 issued by the Respondent No.2 – Aurangabad Smart City ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cheque Dishonour Complaints Against Accused Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as demand notice was not served at the correct address of the accused.

The judgment pertains to three criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the petitioners (Moodalagiriyapp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Railway Advertisement Restricting ATVM Facilitator Posts to Retired Employees. Condition Held Not Arbitrary as It Serves Administrative Convenience and Does Not Violate Article 14.

The petitioner, Furquan Akram, an educated unemployed individual, challenged an advertisement dated 11.08.2015 issued by the South Central Railway for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Nursing Student Seeking Admit Card for Examination. Court Directs University to Issue Hall Ticket and College to Permit Continued Studies Despite Attendance Issues.

The petitioner, Jennifer A., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. She...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case. Claimant's Fall from Train Due to Jerk and Rush Constitutes 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989.

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South Central Railway, appealed against the judgment and award dated 21st September 2010 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal, Upholds Compensation to Parents of Deceased Passenger in Untoward Incident. Deceased Presumed Bona Fide Passenger Under Section 113 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as Railway Failed to Rebut Presumption.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against an award of the Railway Accide...