SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.
16 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "television advertisement"
72 result(s) found
Found 72 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Award Function with Intermittent Performances. Sponsorship Amount for Invitee-Only Event Constitutes Payment for Admission Under Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act.
20 Jun 2024The petitioner, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organized the 'APSARA' award function on 21st January 2006 at Jams...
- 321
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Rampant Illegal Hoardings by Political and Religious Entities Across Maharashtra. Court Interprets Definition of Skysign and Requirement of Written Permission Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
31 Jan 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay was seized with a group of Public Interest Litigations and Writ Petitions raising serious concerns regarding th...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.
10 Sep 2012The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...
- 242
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against STAR TV in Kaun Banega Crorepati Gambling Case. Game Show Held Not to Be Gambling Under Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 as It Involves Substantial Skill.
31 Jan 2006The petitioners, News Television India Ltd. and its directors, challenged the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai dated ...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Ad-Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit for 'Orient' Electric Appliances. Plaintiff's Longstanding Use and Registration of 'Orient' Mark Found Sufficient for Interim Protection Against Defendants' Identical Mark.
5 Feb 2013The plaintiff, Orient Paper & Industries Limited, filed a suit before the Bombay High Court alleging trade mark infringement and passing off against d...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.
30 Oct 2015SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Orders Compensation for Unauthorized Sealing of Cable Network Control Room — Police Action Without Statutory Authority Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India.
1 Mar 2011The petitioners, a partnership firm running a cable television network under the name U.S.A. Cable Networks and its members, filed a writ petition und...
- 150
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Original Assessment Was Based on Full Disclosure and Scrutiny.
17 Feb 2010The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, is engaged in the business of providing audiovisual television content, films, events, and related ...
- 52
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Restraining TV Channels from Telecasting Personal Life Details in Right to Privacy Case. Court Held That Right to Privacy Under Article 21 Includes Right to Be Let Alone and Media Cannot Intrude Into Personal Life Without Consent.
22 Feb 2019The petitioner, Smt. Asha K., a software engineer by profession working at WIPRO, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...
- 117
