Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against STAR TV in Kaun Banega Crorepati Gambling Case. Game Show Held Not to Be Gambling Under Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 as It Involves Substantial Skill.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 121
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, News Television India Ltd. and its directors, challenged the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai dated 8/9/2000 issuing process against them in Criminal Case No. 144/S/2000. The respondent No.1, Ashok D. Waghmare, had filed a complaint alleging that the broadcasting of the programme 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' (KBC) on STAR TV constituted an offence under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 and the Prize Competition Act, 1955. The petitioners contended that KBC is a game of skill, not chance, as participants answer general knowledge questions to win prizes. The court analyzed the nature of the game and held that it involves substantial skill, knowledge, and judgment, distinguishing it from gambling which is based on pure chance. The court noted that the programme requires participants to answer multiple-choice questions correctly, and the element of chance is minimal. Consequently, the court quashed the order of issuance of process, holding that no prima facie case under the gambling laws was made out. The court also observed that the Magistrate had mechanically issued process without applying his mind to the legal position. The petition was allowed, and the criminal proceedings against the petitioners were quashed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of Process - Game of Skill vs Game of Chance - Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, Sections 4, 5 - Prize Competition Act, 1955 - The court examined whether the television programme 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' is a game of skill or chance. Held that the game involves substantial skill in answering questions correctly, and therefore does not fall within the definition of gambling under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The issuance of process by the Magistrate was quashed. (Paras 4-6)

B) Criminal Law - Prize Competition - Prize Competition Act, 1955 - The court considered whether the programme amounts to a prize competition under the Act. Held that the programme is not a prize competition as defined, since it does not involve a competition for prizes based on chance but on knowledge and skill. (Para 6)

C) Criminal Procedure - Issuance of Process - Section 204 Cr.P.C. - The court held that the Magistrate erred in issuing process without considering the nature of the game and the legal position that games of skill are exempt from gambling laws. The order of issuance of process was set aside. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the game show 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' constitutes gambling under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 and the Prize Competition Act, 1955, and whether the issuance of process by the Magistrate was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the order of issuance of process dated 8/9/2000 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai in Criminal Case No. 144/S/2000. The criminal proceedings against the petitioners were set aside.

Law Points

  • Game of skill vs game of chance
  • Gambling definition
  • Prize competition
  • Issuance of process
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (01) 2

Criminal Application No.3318 of 2000

2006-01-31

V.M. Kanade, J.

Mr. P.G. Sabnis for the petitioners, Mr. S.S. Tatkare, APP for the State

News Television India Ltd. and Others

Ashok D. Waghmare and The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application challenging the order of issuance of process by the Metropolitan Magistrate under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 and Prize Competition Act, 1955.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order of issuance of process and the criminal proceedings against the petitioners.

Filing Reason

The respondent No.1 filed a complaint alleging that the broadcasting of the programme 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' constitutes gambling and a prize competition.

Previous Decisions

The Metropolitan Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai issued process against the petitioners on 8/9/2000 in Criminal Case No. 144/S/2000.

Issues

Whether the programme 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' is a game of skill or a game of chance. Whether the programme falls within the definition of gambling under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. Whether the programme constitutes a prize competition under the Prize Competition Act, 1955. Whether the Magistrate was justified in issuing process under Section 204 Cr.P.C.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' is a game of skill as participants answer general knowledge questions, and therefore does not amount to gambling. The respondent No.1 alleged that the programme involves gambling and prize competition, but did not appear to contest the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The game show 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' is a game of skill, not chance, as it requires participants to answer general knowledge questions correctly. Therefore, it does not constitute gambling under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, nor a prize competition under the Prize Competition Act, 1955. The Magistrate erred in issuing process without considering the legal position that games of skill are exempt from gambling laws.

Judgment Excerpts

The programme 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' is a game of skill and not a game of chance. The order of issuance of process by the Metropolitan Magistrate is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The respondent No.1 filed a complaint in the Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Andheri, Mumbai under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 and Prize Competition Act, 1955. The Magistrate issued process on 8/9/2000. The petitioners challenged this order by filing Criminal Application No.3318 of 2000 in the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887: Sections 4, 5
  • Prize Competition Act, 1955:
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): Section 204
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Medical College Selections by Tamil Nadu Selection Committee for Violating Prior Judgment on Interview Marks Distribution. The Court held that absent government allocation among interview heads, each head must be deemed equal an...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Family Court Order Restraining Ex-Wife from Using Husband's Surname After Divorce. Substance Over Form Principle Applied Under Section 7 of Family Courts Act, 1984 to Allow Husband's Interim Appli...