Search Results for "stranger confession"

60 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Extra-Judicial Confession. Axe assault on deceased in field leads to conviction under Section 302 IPC as prosecution proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hivraj Uikey, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli for the murder of the deceased under Section 302 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ku. Panchashila Uttam Thorat, was convicted by the II Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Trial No. 98/2004 for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Theft Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Extra-Judicial Confession Establish Guilt. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen Together, Discovery of Weapon, and Flight Proved Conclusive Under Sections 302, 381, 201 IPC.

The appellant-accused preferred an appeal against his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, under Sections 302, 381, and 201 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen Together, and False Explanation Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

The appellant, Rohidas Manik Kasrale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Lata, and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal from Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence After Establishing Deceased's Identity Through DNA Test.

The appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shimoga, in S.C. No.95/2012 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife by Strangulation. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Surendra Gyanchand Chawla, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Seema by strangulation and sentenced to life ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC in Circumstantial Murder Case. Court Rejects Objection to Composite Charge but Leaves Other Issues Open for Determination.

The appellant, Abdul Hannan Abdulhai Kadri, challenged his conviction under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code by the Adhoc Additional Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC; Circumstantial Evidence Under Scrutiny. Court Notes Deficiencies in Proving Motive, Oral Dying Declarations, Extra-Judicial Confession, and Recovery of Weapons, Raising Doubts on the Chain of Circumstances.

The appeal arose from the conviction of Deepak Maruti Parte (original accused No.1) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.172 of...