Search Results for "statutory restrictions"

865 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 865 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC and Section 67 IT Act in WhatsApp Group Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence -- Petitioner Acquitted of Religious Offence Charges

The Karnataka High Court allowed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 295A IPC and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Potentiality of Land for Non-Agricultural Use Considered Despite Restrictions Under Goa Land Use Act. Deduction of 50% from Sale Price of Unrestricted Land Accepted as Basis for Compensation.

The appellant, Shri Pandhari D'Souza Kuttikar, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 30.05.2006 passed by the Reference Court, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...