Search Results for "smegma"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Ill 60-Year-Old Woman Under Section 376 IPC. Evidence of Incapacitated Victim and DNA Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajmat Shaha @ Ajju Tayyab Shaha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, District Akola, for the offence punishable under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Godfather for Rape of Mentally Retarded Woman Under Section 376(2)(l) IPC — Evidence of Mental Disability and Eyewitness Testimony Sufficient to Sustain Conviction

The appellant, Tiofilo Evangelio Moraes @ Mories, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Margao in Sessions Case No.20/2013 for an offence pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl in POCSO Case. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(f), 377, 363, 364, 367, 201 IPC and POCSO Act affirmed based on DNA evidence and circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, unnatural sex, and murder of a 5-year-old girl by her neighbor, the appellant Dattatraya @ Datta Ambo Rokad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for raping an 11-year-old girl; appeal dismissed as prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohamed Farid Jafer Shaikh, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376(2)(f), 342, 363 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The appellant, Digambar s/o Pandurang Kadu, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as medical evidence did not support rape and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Girjesh Rajendra Prasad, was convicted by the Second Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.161/2004 for the off...