Search Results for "siphoning"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration in Partnership Dispute Involving Simple Allegations of Fraud. Court appoints arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, distinguishing between serious and simple fraud allegations.

The present case arises out of a partnership dispute between Rashid Raza (appellant) and Sadaf Akhtar (respondent). An FIR dated 17.11.2017 was lodged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Administrator’s Report for Recovery of Diverted Estate Assets in Testamentary Suit. Court Appointed Administrator Seeks Directions Against Defendant for Unauthorized Diversion of Deceased’s Funds to Various Entities.

The matter concerned the administration of the estate of Purvez Burjor Dalal, who died in Mumbai on 7 December 2011. A testamentary suit was institute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Incentive Scheme for FCI Loaders but Directs Strict Monitoring to Prevent Abuse of Government Funds. Court finds that while the incentive scheme is legal, its implementation has led to exorbitant earnings and siphoning of funds through collusion with officials.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, took suo motu cognizance of a newspaper report in The Times of India alleging that departmental loaders in Food C...