Search Results for "seizure memo"

484 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 484 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Recovery of 100 grams smack fails as prosecution did not prove samples were drawn from entire contraband and seals were not properly affixed, violating Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, Mehboob Shah, was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Father in Murder Case — Axe Blow on Head Constitutes Murder Under Section 302 IPC. Single Blow on Vital Part with Deadly Weapon After Fetching Axe Indicates Intention to Cause Death, Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC Not Applicable.

The appellant, Mitaram s/o Tohidas Vaidya, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gondia, for the murder of his son Anmol under Section 302 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacks Completeness and Chain of Events.

The judgment arises from two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Upheld. Recovery of Blood-Stained Stone and Gold Chains at Appellant's Instance, Coupled with Last Seen Evidence, Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raja Khan, was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for the murder of Neeraj Yadav and causing disappearance of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC in Black Magic Motive Case — Common Intention Established Through Eyewitness Testimony and Recovery of Weapon.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Reliance on Inadmissible Section 67 Statements. Conviction for Possession of Heroin Set Aside as Mandatory Safeguards Were Not Followed and Confessional Statements Were Inadmissible Under Tofan Singh.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Anwarkhan Jahilkhan Pathan and Firdoskhan Khurshidkhan Pathan against their conviction under the Narcotic Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Ganja Possession — Mandatory Compliance with Section 50 NDPS Act and Sampling Procedure Upheld. Appellants convicted for possessing 80 kg ganja, sentenced to 10 years RI, fine of Rs.1,00,000 each.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Telangana dismissing the criminal appeal against conviction under the NDPS Act. The appellants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Provisions. Failure to Join Independent Witnesses and Non-Observance of Section 50 of NDPS Act Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Sau. Mankarna, Sau. Panchafula, and Udaybhan, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, under Section 20(B)(2)(c) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure of Goods Under Legal Metrology Act for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Seizure Notice. Failure to Provide 15-Day Notice Under Section 15(2) of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 Renders Seizure Illegal and Goods Must Be Returned.

The petitioners, Cadbury India Ltd. and its shareholder Vijay Madali, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...