Search Results for "section 33(4)"

520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment based on mere change of opinion on share premium addition under Section 68 is invalid as all material was disclosed during original assessment.

The petitioner, Rajshree Realtors Private Limited, a real estate company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-2013 declaring income of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010341872013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 43B Explanation 3C. Interest Converted into Debentures Not Deemed Actually Paid as Per Retrospective Amendment, Disallowing Deduction Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an appeal by M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-III, concerning the interpretation of Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985

The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...