Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010341872013_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-11 15:48:36
  • 81
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010341872013_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (01) 10

WP Nos.38256/2013

2014-01-06

H.G. Ramesh

Jayakumar S. Patil, Devi Prasad Shetty for petitioner; Ravivarma Kumar (Advocate General) with D. Nagaraj for R-1 & R-2; S. Viswajith Shetty for R-3; A. Niranjan Kumar for R-4; P.S. Malipatil for R-7; I.G. Gachchinamath for R-8; H.C. Shivarama for R-9; K. Chandranath Ariga for R-10

M. Abdul Azeez

The State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner Mangalore District, Mangalore City Municipal Corporation, Belgaum City Municipal Corporation, Bellary City Municipal Corporation, Davangere City Municipal Corporation, Gulbarga City Municipal Corporation, Hubli-Dharwad City Municipal Corporation, Mysore City Municipal Corporation, G. Jayalalitha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the reservation of the post of Mayor

Remedy Sought

Quash the notification dated 21.8.2013 and direct the State to allot the post of Mayor by reservation as per rotation system under Article 243T(4)

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227, Article 243T(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
reservation rotation mayor Article 243T(4) Constitution of India writ petition

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines 2026-09-17 02:44:56
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court Conviction in Murder Case Stemming from Dog Bark Incident. Court Examines Whether Accused Were Aggressors and Whether FIR Statement of Co-Accused Could Be Used to Infer Motive Under Indian Evidence Act, 1... 2026-09-17 02:44:41
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?