Search Results for "section 26"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 26"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Additional Compensation Under Section 30(3) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 on Market Value Including Multiplication Factor-2. The Court held that 'market value' under Section 3(u) includes the multiplication Factor-2 under Section 26(2), and additional compensation must be computed on that enhanced value.

26 Feb 2026

The petitioners, landowners whose land was acquired for railway purposes, challenged the award of additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the R...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Additional Compensation Under Section 30(3) of RFCTLARR Act on Market Value Including Multiplication Factor-2. The Court held that 'market value' under Section 3(u) includes the multiplication factor under Section 26(2), and additional compensation under Section 30(3) must be computed on that enhanced value.

26 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Piyushbhai Kanchanbhai Patel and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Under Section 26 of Domestic Violence Act in Divorce Proceedings. Application Under Section 26 of DV Act Held Maintainable in Civil Suit for Divorce, and Appeal Under Section 29 Lies to Sessions Court Against Order of Civil Court.

5 May 2017

The petitioner, Shri Narayan Babi Salgaonkar, a police constable, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an or...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Order in Mundkar Dispute — Tribunal Exceeded Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 26 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Mamlatdar and Collector Cannot Be Reversed Without Perversity.

9 Oct 2018

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Mrs. Antoneta Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Child Maintenance Dispute Following Mediated Settlement — Parties Agree to Mutually Resolve All Pending Litigations Including Custody and Maintenance.

7 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Arvind Kumar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 02.01.2016 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order in Gram Panchayat Dispute — Holds That Appellate Authority Must Decide Appeal on Merits Without Remanding to Collector. The Court set aside the Additional Divisional Commissioner's order remanding the matter to the Collector and directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits under Section 26 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

1 Nov 2023

The petitioners, residents and voters of village Haldi, Taluka-Karveer, District-Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Stay on Interest Demand in MVAT Case — Tribunal Erred in Treating Composite Order as Non-Appealable Under Section 30(2). The court held that an appellate order confirming interest under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, when part of a composite assessment order, is appealable and stay can be granted.

6 Jun 2023

The petitioner, S. K. Trading Co., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 Septemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

3 Mar 2017

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Transport Contract Dispute, Holds Mutual Mistake Warrants Rectification of Contract Distance. Court Finds Actual Distance 307 km, Not 263 km as Stated in Work Order; Appellant Entitled to Claim for Excess Work Under Section 70 of Contract Act.

9 Feb 2012

The dispute arose from a transport contract for emergency coal transportation from New Majri Colliery to Paras power station. The plaintiff, a transpo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case Due to Failure to Argue Correct Legal Provision Before Tribunal. Penalty Under Section 28(1)(c) on Reconstituted Firm Held Invalid as Revenue Relied Solely on Section 44 Which Applies Only to Discontinuance of Business, and the Question of Applicability of Section 26 Was Not Raised Before the Tribunal.

12 Mar 1969

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a reference under section 66 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The respondent firm, M/s. Kirkend Coal...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)