KAHC010480352008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "section 13(8)"
2463 result(s) found
Found 2463 result(s)
High Court
- 90
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...
- 77
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Company Having Been Dissolved Prior to Issuance of Cheque. Director Not Held Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Company Struck Off Under Companies Act, 1956.
1 Jul 2026Background: The petitioner, a director of Giga Networks Private Limited, approached the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...
- 62
High Court
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Cognizance in Cheque Bounce Case — No Ground to Interfere with Concurrent Findings. Petitioners/accused failed to show any illegality in the order of taking cognizance under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the revisional order rejecting their challenge.
22 Jan 2026The petitioners, who are the accused in a cheque dishonour case, filed a criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita...
- 625
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.
9 Jul 2019The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Service of Statutory Notice Valid Despite Unsigned Office Copy. Absence of Signature on Office Copy of Demand Notice Does Not Invalidate Service Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
3 Sep 2019The appellant, Vardhman Steel, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Sai Engineering, al...
- 80
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.
3 Mar 2025The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...
- 722
