Search Results for "scientific examination"

836 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 836 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows ICAR Appeal in Service Benefit Dispute — Scientists and Technical Staff Not Similarly Situated for Advance Increments on Acquiring Ph.D. Article 14 Does Not Mandate Equal Treatment Across Distinct Cadres Governed by Different Rules.

The case involves a dispute between the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and its technical staff (respondents) regarding entitlement to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 53-A CrPC for Medical Examination of Accused in Rape Cases. Challenge to police notice for medical examination dismissed as Section 53-A is not violative of Article 20(3) or Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati Swamiji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of BARC Engineer for Sanctioning Non-Existent Works and Causing Financial Loss to Government. The court held that the punishment of dismissal was proportionate to the gravity of the charges of fraud and cheating proved in the departmental inquiry.

The petitioner, Madhukar G. Wagh, was initially appointed in May 1958 as a Senior Scientific Assistant in the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Stepfather in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Excluding Paternity — Scientific Evidence Overrides Circumstantial and Testimonial Weaknesses in Rape Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f),(i),(j) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Govind alias Hemrab s/o Mahadeo Deolkar/Deulkar, was convicted by the learned Designated Judge, POCSO Act and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows DNA Test in Partition Suit to Determine Paternity Under Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC. The court upheld the appellate court's order for DNA testing to establish the relationship between the parties in a partition suit.

The petitioner, Sri Hanumappa, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13.1.2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge at Hiriyur in R.A.No.11/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Circulars Mandating Public Examinations for 5th and 8th Standard Students. Petitioners Contend Circulars Violate Sections 16, 30, 38(4) of Right to Education Act, 2009 and Section 145 of Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of four writ petitions filed by associations of unaided private schools and a parent of a fifth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Expunging of Expert Evidence Applying Foreign Law in Suit for Enforcement of Foreign Judgment. Expert Witness Cannot Apply Foreign Law to Facts; Only State the Law Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 45 Evidence Act.

The plaintiffs filed a Notice of Motion seeking to expunge parts of the affidavit of evidence of the defendants' expert witness, Mr. Patrick Keel, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Workman Status of General Manager (Research) in Industrial Disputes Act Case. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the employee, not the designation, determines workman status, and the respondent's work was primarily technical and clerical.

The petitioner, M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research & Development Centre, a nonprofit scientific research organization, challenged an order of the Ind...