Search Results for "revenue profiteering"

67 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment on Writ Petition Against Refusal of Stamp Duty Refund Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Limitation Dispute Under Section 48(3) Due to Correction of Applicant's Name Beyond Six Months.

The writ petition was filed by Freedom City Ventures, a partnership firm, seeking to quash the order dated 21st June 2014 passed by the Inspector Gene...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Unexplained Investment in Silver Bullion. Section 69A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Applicable Where Assessee Fails to Explain Source of Acquisition of Silver Found in Possession.

The present appeals were filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the appeals of the assessee, Prakash Chan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Interplay Between Sections 14A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 109 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 in Layout Approval Dispute

This matter concerns a writ petition filed by a House Building Co-operative Society against the Mandya Urban Development Authority (MUDA) and the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Land to Judges' Cooperative Housing Society. Allotment of land by MHADA to a cooperative housing society formed by judges was held to be legal and not arbitrary.

The petitioner, Ketan Tirodkar, a citizen of India, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the allotment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020009812016_1

...