Search Results for "reopening after four years"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Already Scrutinized Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Sterlite Technologies Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reasse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Already Disclosed Loan Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Jainam Investments, a partnership firm engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening and Agricultural Income Estimation Case. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid for lack of tangible material, and Tribunal's reversal of CIT(A)'s agricultural income estimation set aside as perverse.

The appellant, Shri S L Basavaraj (HUF), an assessee, filed appeals against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 30 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Assessee Had Made Full Disclosure in Return and Notes.

The petitioner, NYK Line (India) Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident shipping line, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2006-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, 3i Infotech Limited, challenged a notice dated 18 March 2009 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax seeking to reopen the ...