Search Results for "re-development agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "re-development agreement"

510 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 510 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Resident Welfare Association Against Developer for Non-Payment of Adequate Compensation Under DCR 33(7). MHADA Directed to Determine and Enforce Compensation for Temporary Alternate Accommodation as Per Notarized Agreements.

26 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Kagalwala Building Resident Welfare Association, representing residents of a building being redeveloped by respondent No.4 (Aaraaish D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

11 Jun 2014

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Section 9 Order Directing Handover of Redeveloped Flat and Transit Benefits to Occupant in Possession. Court Reiterates Principle that Redevelopment Cannot Be Used to Evict Occupant and that the Person Dishoused Must Receive Transit Rent and Be Put Back in Possession of New Flat Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Jun 2025

The dispute centered on Flat No. 12 in Spectrum building, Khar, Mumbai, which was undergoing redevelopment. The flat was occupied by Leena, wife of Ro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Commercial Redevelopment Over Tenant's Objection — Tenant Cannot Dictate Nature of Redevelopment Under DCPR 2034 Regulation 33(19). The court held that a tenant's insistence on residential redevelopment after demolition of a dilapidated building is not sustainable, and the landlord is entitled to redevelop as per permissible rules.

29 Mar 2023

The petitioner, G M Heights LLP, is the owner of land in Bandra, Mumbai, which previously had a building with 21 tenants, some commercial and some res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Specific Performance of Development Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness. The court held that the supplementary agreement dated 17th March 2011 bound the parties and the plaintiff did not perform his obligations under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

15 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Sarabjeet Singh Gopal Singh Baweja, owned a plot of land that was tenanted. He entered into an initial development agreement on 17th Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Co-operative Housing Society in CRZ-II Area Without Prior CRZ Clearance Under 2011 Notification — Stop Work Notice Quashed. The court held that para 8(iii) of the CRZ Notification 2011 permits redevelopment of existing authorized buildings in CRZ-II areas without prior CRZ clearance, and the stop work notice issued by MCZMA was invalid.

3 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Sea Green Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is the lessee of land admeasuring approximately 1,672 sq. mtrs. in Worli, Mumbai, which f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

4 Mar 2025

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Redevelopment Agreement — Appellant Entitled to Specific Performance of Flat Allotment. Court held that the appellant was entitled to the entire 830 sq. ft. flat as per the agreement, not merely 562.5 sq. ft. free of cost, and that the learned Single Judge erred in restricting the relief.

20 Oct 2015

The appellant, Kedar Chandrakant Berde, was the original plaintiff in a suit against Rishabraj Housing and Virangula Cooperative Housing Society Limit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Majority Consent and Sanctioned Plans Upheld. Court held that the redevelopment scheme was validly sanctioned and the petitioners' objections were not sufficient to stall the project.

13 Dec 2010

The petitioners, seventeen occupants of residential tenements in Dalal Estate, Mumbai Central, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)