Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

1368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shivaji Santu Zanzad, a driver of a PMT bus, challenging his conviction under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Stalking and Rash Driving Case Due to Material Contradictions and Ante-Dated Witness Statements. Conviction under Sections 279, 354D, 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Ingredients of Stalking and Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Rakesh Matasharan Shukla challenging his conviction by the Trial Court and upheld by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Bus Fire Caused by Negligence of KSRTC Driver. Claimant Entitled to Compensation as Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition on Grounds of Non-Joinder of Driver and Lack of Negligence Evidence.

The appellant/claimant, Smt. Chandra Prabha P., filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for inj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Dismissal of Driver for Rash Driving Causing Accident. KSRTC's Disciplinary Action Validated as Accident Resulted from Negligent Driving, Not Mechanical Failure.

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) filed a writ petition challenging an award dated 12.10.2018 passed by the Principal District Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased motorcyclist hit by tempo from behind; court holds tempo driver solely negligent, enhances compensation to Rs.2,58,44,336/- with 9% interest.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Anil Yadav, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...