Search Results for "provisional attachment order"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Liquidators Challenging Benami Act Attachment Orders, Upholds NCLAT Ruling that IBC Authorities Lack Jurisdiction to Entertain Challenges to Benami Act Orders During Insolvency Proceedings

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by liquidators challenging provisional attachment orders issued under the Prohibition of Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in GST Case for Non-Compliance with Section 83(1) MGST Act — Attachment Without Pending Proceeding or Prior Notice Invalid

The petitioner, Praful Nanji Satra, a businessman who rented out commercial premises and paid GST on license fees, challenged a provisional attachment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment of Bank Account in GST Case — Attachment Without Show Cause Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Section 83(1) of CGST Act, 2017 Requires Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Attachment.

The petitioner, Kaish Impex Private Limited, a company engaged in the export of perfumes and compound fragrance oil and registered under the Goods and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Attachment Orders Under PMLA — Enforcement Directorate's Provisional Attachment Orders Set Aside for Lack of Proper Service and Non-Compliance with Section 5(1) of PMLA

The judgment concerns six criminal writ petitions filed by various individuals and companies challenging provisional attachment orders passed by the D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order and Show Cause Notice Under PMLA for Lack of Reasons. Show Cause Notice Under Section 8(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Must Contain Reasons for Belief of Offence Under Section 3 or Possession of Proceeds of Crime.

The petitioner, Brizo Reality Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash a provisional attachment order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...