Search Results for "promotion affected"

711 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 711 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion to Law Officer Post in Municipal Corporation — Petitioner Not Entitled to Promotion as Appointment Was by Direct Recruitment and Petitioner Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria.

The petitioner, Sanghmitra R. Sandansing, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to promote her to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order in Promotion Dispute Due to Non-Joinder of Affected Parties. Seniority-Based Promotion Claim Fails as Persons Promoted in Supersession Were Not Impleaded as Respondents Under MRTU and PULP Act.

The petitioner, Parmatma Ek Sevak Nagarik Sahakari Bank, challenged the judgment and order dated 27.08.2008 passed by the Industrial Court in Complain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preference for Direct Recruit Assistants Over Non-Graduate Promotees in Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service. Rule Read Down to Exclude Graduate Promotees from Discrimination.

The case involves a dispute over the implementation of amended Rule 5(g) and Annexure-III item (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Deemed Promotion to Retired Employee Despite Disciplinary Proceedings — Employer Cannot Ignore Exoneration by Enquiry Officer. Stigmatic remarks in disagreement order set aside as promotion cannot be denied when employee is exonerated of all charges.

The petitioner, Rajendra S/o Baburao Patil, a retired employee of Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, filed a writ petition seeking deemed date of promotion to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition by BBMP Employees Challenging Promotion of Juniors Based on PUC Qualification. Senior Group D Employees Claim Discrimination as 2014 Clarification Exempted SSLC Holders from PUC Requirement for Promotion to Tax Inspector Posts.

The writ petition was filed by seventeen employees of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) working as Group D employees, challenging a promotion ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal, Directs Consideration for Promotion Despite Past Punishment. Government Check-Period Instruction Held Inoperative as Punishment Period Had Expired by Crucial Date.

(1) Background: The dispute concerned the denial of promotion to the post of Deputy Tahsildar in the Revenue Department of Tamil Nadu. The respondent,...