Search Results for "project affected persons"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "project affected persons"

884 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 884 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Karwar Port Expansion Over SEIAA Authority and Consent Deficiencies. Petitions by Fishermen Associations Raise Category A Project and Pollution Control Compliance Issues Under EIA Notification.

29 Jul 2021

Two public interest litigations were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

4 Dec 2017

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in DMICDC Project — Upholds Right of Tenderer to Withdraw Before Acceptance Under Section 5 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

24 Aug 2017

The Government of India envisaged the development of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMICDC), a large infrastructure project covering approximat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to MoEF Direction for Demolition of Compound Wall in CRZ Area — Non-Compliance with Environmental Clearance Conditions and Environment Protection Act, 1986 Justifies Direction. Construction of Compound Wall Without Necessary Approvals in Coastal Regulation Zone Violates Environmental Regulations.

10 Jun 2016

The writ petition arose from a solid waste management project established by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai at Kanjur Marg, Mumbai. The M...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Recruitment Reservation Policy for Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court Holds that Section 10(6)(a) Prescribes 5% Quota for PAPs, and Section 6(c) Ensures Priority Within That Quota, Not an Overall 50% Reservation.

29 Oct 2015

The dispute arose from the acquisition of lands of the petitioners for the establishment of the Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University at P...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Challenge to 5% Quota for Project Affected Persons in Agricultural University Recruitment. Court Upholds Government's Interpretation of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999, Limiting Reservation to 5% Priority Quota Under Section 10(6)(a), Not 50% Under Section 6(c).

29 Oct 2015

The matter involved two writ petitions filed by project affected persons whose lands were acquired for the establishment of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Challenging Environmental Clearance for 355 MW Power Project — Clearance Upheld as Compliant with Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Notification Requirements. The court found no violation of environmental norms and that the challenge was without merit.

28 Jun 2012

The Gram Panchayat of Navlakh Umbre, through an association, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

1 Jan 1970

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)