Search Results for "prior representation"

3095 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3095 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Continued Detention Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Consideration of Representation. Failure of Detaining Authority to Consider Detenu's Representation Before State Government Approval Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Arif Amin Shaikh, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. Challenge Centers on Whether Non-Literal Translation of Right to Representation in Marathi Vitiates Detention Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The matter arose from a criminal writ petition filed by the detenu under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of preventive ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Elected Candidate in Office of Profit Disqualification Case. Special Government Pleader Appointment Under Order 27 Rule 8B CPC Held Not an Office of Profit Under Article 191(1)(a) of Constitution, and Rajasthan Act 5 of 1969 Retrospectively Removed Disqualification.

This appeal arose from an election petition challenging the election of Kanta Kathuria to the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly from the Kolayat constitu...