Search Results for "prior permissions"

766 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 766 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MCGM's Condition Requiring No Objection Certificate from Indian Navy for Occupancy Certificate and Development Permission. Petitioners Argue That Imposition of Such Condition is Arbitrary and Without Statutory Sanction.

The case involves two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In Writ Petition No. 229 of 2018, M/s S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petitions Against Slum Rehabilitation Permissions — Earlier Appeals Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Dismissed. Developer Contends Petitioners Lack Locus Standi as Only Minority of Society Members Objected.

The case involved two writ petitions filed by certain members of registered co-operative housing societies, namely Hanuman Hitwardhak SRA CHS Ltd., Ek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission for Construction Allegedly Encroaching on Public Right of Way. Court finds no violation of licence conditions and holds that petitioners failed to establish any public right of way over the property.

The petitioners, a village group and its president, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging development permiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...