Search Results for "previous employer liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "previous employer liability"

280 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Damages Levy Case Under Section 14B of EPF Act — Delay in Payment of Provident Fund Dues Attracts Damages Irrespective of Financial Difficulties. Financial Hardship Not a Valid Defence for Delayed Provident Fund Contributions Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

22 Jun 2005

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) appealed against a Single Judge order that set aside notices/orders dated 17.7.1990 and 24.6.1992 levy...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ESI Recovery Against Auction Purchaser in Deemed Transfer Case — Section 93-A of ESI Act Does Not Apply to Sales by Financial Corporation Under Section 29(2) of SFC Act. Auction purchaser of property from Maharashtra State Financial Corporation is not liable for prior owner's ESI arrears as the transfer is by operation of law and not by the employer.

21 Feb 2006

The petitioner, M/s. ANK Seals, a registered partnership firm, purchased a plot of land and building (U-149 in MIDC, Nagpur) in an auction sale conduc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints Against Newspaper Publisher for Lack of Vicarious Liability Under Negotiable Instruments Act. Publisher Not Liable for Dishonour of Cheques Issued by Employees Without Authorisation.

30 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Lokmat Media Private Limited, a newspaper publishing company, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets 'Setting Up' of Establishment Under Section 16(1)(b) of Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952, Determining Whether Change of Ownership Creates New Establishment for Exemption Purposes. The Court Clarified the Test for Fresh Exemption Period When an Existing Business is Transferred to a New Owner.

17 Sep 1969

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Compensation Award for Illegal Termination of Teachers Under MEPS Act. Termination Without Prior Approval of Education Officer Held Illegal, but Back Wages Limited to One Year's Salary as Reinstatement Not Feasible Due to Superannuation.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment involves four writ petitions arising from a dispute between two retired teachers, Baburao Dahat and Sulbha Hejib, and their employer, Jaw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 17-B Application for Six Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer Must Pay Full Wages Pending Writ. Workmen's Affidavits of Unemployment Sufficient; No Need to Plead Not Gainfully Employed in Original Affidavit.

12 Mar 2010

The case involves a Civil Application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, filed by Kirloskar Pneumatic Kamgar Sangh (the Union) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Employees' Union Against EPFO for Treating Provident Fund Account as Inoperative and Denying Interest. The court held that when an establishment is transferred as a going concern and employees continue in service, the provident fund account cannot be treated as inoperative under Paragraph 72(1) of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952.

10 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Johnson & Johnson Employees' Union, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

15 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Deceased Driver's Employment Under Owner Proved by Oral and Documentary Evidence, Including Driving License and Insurance Policy, Under Section 30(1) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

28 Aug 2019

The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, agains...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)