Search Results for "physical dispossession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "physical dispossession"

199 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds First Appellate Court's Declaration of Unlawful Possession and Order for Vacant Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove tenancy rights and that the defendant's title by sale deed from mortgagee was valid, rejecting the plaintiff's claim of adverse possession.

5 Mar 2024

The case involves a property dispute over City Survey No. 2463 at Wai, Satara. The plaintiff, Ramesh Anandrao Shirke (since deceased, represented by l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Possession Based on Prior Possession. The court held that the appellant had established prior possession and dispossession without consent, entitling her to a decree for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

9 Jan 2006

The appellant, Cian De Souza, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking vacation and peaceful possession of Flat No.4, Ha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

29 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Tenant's Long-Standing Possession Upheld. Suit for Permanent Injunction and Possession Decreed Based on Prior Possession and Rent Receipts, Not Title.

9 Aug 2010

The dispute pertains to a suit house consisting of seven rooms bearing Municipal House No. 2 in Swami Vivekanand Ward, Hinghanghat, District Wardha. T...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition on Urban Land Ceiling Act Repeal and Possession — Court Analyzes Validity of Dispossession Under Section 10(5) and (6) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

24 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Vijay Kisan Kate, approached the High Court of Bombay by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Bank's Illegal Dispossession of Auction Purchaser. Petitioner Purchased Flat in 2017 Auction by SBI, but Was Forcibly Evicted by Saraswat Bank in 2025 Without Due Process.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioners, Mariyam Rangwala and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Restitution Plea in Testamentary Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Consent Terms Discharge Court Receiver Without Court Order; Applicants Seek Possession Restored.

8 Jul 2005

The dispute arose from the estate of Shalini Devi Ghatge, who died on 12.08.1982 leaving two wills. One will dated 06.01.1982 was propounded by the ex...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellant's Adverse Possession Claim Fails Due to Lack of Evidence of Hostile Possession and Non-Payment of Court Fee on Counterclaim. The court held that mere long possession without hostile animus does not constitute adverse possession under the Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Nov 2021

The present appeal arises from a decree for possession passed by the trial court in O.S.No.77/1999. The respondents (plaintiffs) claimed that the suit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Permanent Injunction Suit Over Land Acquisition, Citing Failure to Prove Possession. Civil Court Confirms That After Final Notification for Bangalore-Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Project, Plaintiff Could Not Show Lawful Possession of Claimed 2408 Sq Ft in Sy.No.154/10.

25 Nov 2021

The appeal arose from dismissal of original suit for permanent injunction filed by plaintiff Rangappa against land acquisition authorities and benefic...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)