Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Rejected. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Default and Foreclosure Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Sea Eagle Dredging Marine Infrastructure Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Scope of Interference Under Section 37 Is Limited and Impugned Order Did Not Suffer From Patent Illegality or Perversity.

The petitioners, Wind World (India) Limited and others, filed an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Rescission and Quantification of Damages Are Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a construction contract dispute. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Finding of Delay and Quantification of Liquidated Damages Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s B.E. Billimoria & Co. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging part of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of agreement to sell immovable property, finding no grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rajesh V. Choudhary, filed Arbitration Petition No.734 of 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...