Search Results for "partners not impleaded"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "partners not impleaded"

146 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Property Appeal Despite 14-Year Delay. Application under Order XXII Rule 10 read with Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 granted as no time limit prescribed for devolution of interest, and impleadment avoids abatement without prejudice to appellants.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed in 1974, which was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs in 2011. The defendants appealed, and during ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.

17 Dec 2024

The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Unpaid Rent, Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend. Triable issues raised regarding termination of lease and liability of partners under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

19 Jun 2023

The plaintiff, PVR Ltd., filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendants, Proetus Ventures LLP and its partners, Shardul Bayas and Abhinay Rame...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Respondents Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Court holds that the trial court's rejection of application to set aside ex-parte decree was erroneous as the respondents were not duly served and had a valid defence.

5 May 2014

The petitioner, M/s Cosme Mathias Menezes Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of money against M/s Naguesh Electronics, initially described as a prop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

19 Nov 2013

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing Deletion of Parties in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action Not Established. The court held that the presence of defendants 6 to 8 was necessary for complete adjudication of the dispute relating to partnership property and family settlement under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

25 Oct 2013

The petitioners, defendants 1 to 4 in Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order dated 18 April 2012,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Goa Rent Control Case — Subletting and Non-User of Garage Premises Established. Tenant's Failure to Use Premises for Leased Purpose and Unauthorized Subletting Justified Eviction Under Sections 22(2)(a) and 22(2)(b) of Goa, Daman and Diu Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

5 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Shri Vinayak Ranum D. P. Loundo, challenged the judgment and order dated 21.03.2011 passed in Eviction Appeal No. 10/2007 and the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Execution Against Partner in Consent Decree — Order XXI Rule 50 CPC. Leave under Order XXI Rule 50 CPC is required to execute a consent decree against a partner of a partnership firm, and the execution application and warrant of attachment can be amended to include the partner's name.

29 Aug 2005

The plaintiffs, M/s. G.M. Breweries Ltd., filed five summary suits against various defendants, including partnership firms. In Suit No.1791 of 2002, a...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)