Search Results for "outside factory"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "outside factory"

260 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

20 Feb 2026

The appellant, Shamji @ Sunil @ Dakudo S/o Kalubhai Mer, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jetpur at Rajkot, for the murders of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Against ESI Coverage for Akola Sale Depot. Sale Depot Held to Be a 'Shop' Under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Requiring Payment of ESI Contributions.

22 Dec 2025

The appellant, Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 18.01.2010 passed by the Industrial Court, Ako...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses ESIC Appeal, Holds Hospital Not a Factory Under ESI Act. Pathological laboratory performing diagnostic tests does not constitute a manufacturing process under Section 2(12)(a) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

24 Aug 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) against an order of the ESI Court, Nagpur, which set aside a communica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows CENVAT Credit for Input Services Used for Storage Tanks Outside Factory in Central Excise Case — Services Used in Relation to Storage of Inputs Eligible for Credit Even if Received Outside Factory Premises.

6 Mar 2013

The appellant, M/s. Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., is a manufacturer of excisable goods under Chapters 28, 29, and 31 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Octroi Duty on Goods Not Consumed Within Municipal Limits — Goods Imported into City but Immediately Taken to Factory Outside Octroi Limits Not Liable to Octroi Under Section 114(3) of City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948.

23 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Yawalkar Pesticides Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had its registered office at Nagpur and a factory...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Provident Fund Demand — Taj Residency Held Separate Establishment Entitled to Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(d) of EPF Act. The court held that the Taj Residency, Nasik was a newly established hotel with separate identity and not a branch of Hotel President, Mumbai, and thus entitled to infancy protection under Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

11 Feb 2011

The petitioners, Piem Hotels Limited and another, challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) dated 31 March 1999, which he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Government Jurisdiction in Gratuity Claims. Establishment Not Under Central Control or Having Multi-State Branches Falls Under State Government Under Section 2(a) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

23 Mar 2005

The dispute in this case centered on whether the appropriate Government for the Petitioner, M/s. Rhone Poulene (India) Ltd., under the Payment of Grat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Employer in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Workman After Fair Domestic Enquiry. Labour Court's Interference Set Aside as Enquiry Was Proper and Punishment Not Disproportionate Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

7 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Chloride India Ltd. (now Exide Industries Ltd.), challenged the Award dated 19.9.1995 passed by the IInd Labour Court, Pune in Referen...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)