Search Results for "mobile phone ownership"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "mobile phone ownership"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, Holding Both Employer and Manager Jointly Liable for Death of Worker in Explosion at Explosive Godown. The court set aside the Commissioner's award exonerating the employer and directed joint and several liability.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the legal heirs of deceased Maroti Misal against the J...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances, Particularly with Recovery of Gold Chain Lacking Corroboration.

30 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Investigation Lapses. High Court Conviction Under IPC Sections 302 and 201 Reversed, Trial Court Acquittal Restored

27 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeals, setting aside the High Court's conviction and restoring the Trial Court's acquittal of the appellants ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Housebreaking and Theft Case — Petitioner Granted Pre-arrest Bail. Court held that custodial interrogation was not necessary as the petitioner had cooperated with investigation and the alleged offence under Sections 457 and 380 IPC did not involve violence or recovery of stolen property.

4 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Shri Vishal Ramesh Khatwani, filed a revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.

28 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

11 Aug 2017

The case involves two appeals against conviction for murder, robbery, and causing disappearance of evidence. The deceased, Madan Phatak, went missing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Victim's Father in Acquittal Case — Remands for Retrial Due to Non-Compliance with Section 313 CrPC. Failure to Put Incriminating Circumstances to Accused and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses Renders Trial Unfair.

23 Sep 2016

The appellant, Govind Sambhaji Hanmante, the father of the deceased victim, filed an appeal against the acquittal of respondents 2 to 6 (original accu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom and Robbery Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Testimony of Victim and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the victim's testimony was credible and the chain of circumstances established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

7 Dec 2006

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, on 15.6.2002. The appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

29 Mar 2005

The appellant, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the Special Judge in NDPS Case No. 116 of 2000 for an offence under Section 8(c) punishable under...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)