Search Results for "maximum units"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "maximum units"

354 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 354 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MEP Notification for Iron Ore and Steel Products as Valid Exercise of Power Under Foreign Trade Act. Court holds that Minimum Export Price is a reasonable condition for export licensing and does not violate fundamental rights.

25 Jan 2016

The petitioners, JSW Steel Limited and Welspun Tradings Limited, along with their officers, challenged the constitutional validity of the Minimum Expo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure of Goods Under Legal Metrology Act for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Seizure Notice. Failure to Provide 15-Day Notice Under Section 15(2) of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 Renders Seizure Illegal and Goods Must Be Returned.

27 Jun 2006

The petitioners, Cadbury India Ltd. and its shareholder Vijay Madali, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.

11 Dec 2019

The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court which directe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Irrigation Restoration Charges — Rate and Area of IRC Disputed; Petitioner Alleges Discrimination and Exorbitant Demand. Issue of whether IRC should be calculated at Rs. 50,000 per hectare as per report dated 11.01.2008 instead of Rs. 1 lakh per hectare under Government Resolution dated 06.03.2009.

5 May 2016

The petitioner, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in power generation, challenged the demand for Irrigatio...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Act Section 80-IB(10) Cases – Clause (d) Commercial Area Limit Not Applicable to Projects Approved Before 31 March 2005. Housing Projects Approved Pre-2005 Held Entitled to Deduction Under Section 80-IB(10) Even if Commercial Area Exceeds 5% or 2000 Sq Ft, Per Ratio in CIT v. Brahma Associates.

19 Sep 2014

These two income tax appeals were filed by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appell...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds UGC Regulations on Deemed Universities — Regulations Held Valid and Not Ultra Vires. The court dismissed petitions challenging the UGC (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations 2010, finding them within the rule-making power under Section 26 of the UGC Act, 1956 and not violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution.

22 May 2014

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by deemed universities, including Manipal University and Sri Siddartha Academy of Higher Education...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

19 Mar 2015

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Order Restricting Developer to G+4 Floors for Public Parking Lot, Finds Construction Substantially Progressed Under Section 51 MRTP Act. Court Holds Protection Under Proviso to Section 51(1) Available Once Operations Have Substantially Progressed, Not Just Substantially Completed.

9 Jul 2012

The dispute arose from a development project on plot bearing Final Plot No. 46 of Town Planning Scheme-III at Shivaji Park, Mumbai, owned by Kohinoor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

8 Jun 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Allotment of Additional Fair Price Shops Beyond Advertised Number. Revisional Authority Under Maharashtra Foodgrains Rationing Order, 1966 Cannot Grant More Shops Than Advertised, and Minimum/Maximum Unit Norms Mandate a Fresh Advertisement.

22 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Shri Suryakant Govindrao Shinde, was one of the successful applicants for a fair price shop in an advertisement issued by the Controll...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)