Search Results for "mandatory meetings"

655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator for Co-operative Housing Society Under Section 77A of MCS Act, 1960. Court upholds Registrar's power to appoint administrator when committee fails to convene annual general meeting and elections are overdue.

The petitioners, members of Ganga Bhavan Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged the appointment of an administrator by the Deputy Registrar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Chairman of Panchayat Samiti — Motion Valid Despite Absence of Members. Section 35 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 does not require quorum for no-confidence meeting; notice properly served.

The petitioners, six elected members of Panchayat Samiti, Mahagaon, challenged the no-confidence motion passed against the Chairman, respondent no.3, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Scheme of Amalgamation Without Physical Meeting in Exceptional Circumstances. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Eliminate Requirement of Meeting Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme Approval.

The judgment addresses a Company Summons for Direction filed by Godrej Industries Limited (GIL) seeking approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation with Wada...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Order Appointing Administrator under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Petitioners Contend Registrar Failed to Exhaust Options of Internal Management and Erroneously Declared Committee Inoperative Due to Invalid Co-option.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 1 July 2025 of the Minister of Co-op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Procedural Irregularities Such as Lack of Proposer and Seconder and Secret Ballot Demand Found Not Fatal to the Motion's Validity as Majority Rule Prevails.

The petitioners, Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Rahuwadi, were elected from a body of eleven members. On 3rd October 2023, seven members s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Invalidating No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Rules Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Substantial Compliance Sufficient.

The petitioner, Prajakta Prabhakar Kadu, the Up-Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Shedsai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...