Search Results for "jute industry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "jute industry"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 2320 OF 2018

4 Feb 2019

The matter arises from a writ petition filed by Mandhana Industries Ltd, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, against an order o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Denial of Termination. Employer's Affidavit Stating No Termination Occurred Renders Complaint Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 Infructuous.

1 Sep 2016

The petitioner, M/s Satish Motors Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court directing it to deposit three months' wages in a complaint filed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.

9 Sep 2014

The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Use of 'RPG' Mark by Defendants in Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The court held that the Defendants' use of 'RPG' as a prominent feature in their trade name was deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and likely to cause confusion.

21 Mar 2022

The Plaintiff, RPG Enterprises Limited, a multi-industry Indian conglomerate, filed a suit against the Defendants, Riju Ghoshal and Poulami Ghoshal, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Sales Promotion and Physician Sample Expenses is Invalid.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Abbott India Limited (successor of Solvay Pharma India Ltd.), challenged a notice dated 27 March 2015 issued under Section 148 of the ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)