Search Results for "input tax credit reversal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "input tax credit reversal"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Answers Reference Against Assessee in Cenvat Credit Reversal Case for Exempted Goods. Supreme Court Precedent Requires Reversal Even When No Sale Involved Under Rule 57CC of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

25 Jun 2026

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem filed a reference case under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, seeking an answer to a question...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit Under Inverted Duty Structure in GST — Rejection by Authorities Set Aside. Held that refund of unutilized ITC is admissible under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 even when output supply is partially exempt, and that the formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 must be applied correctly.

23 Apr 2026

The petitioner, CHEC-TPL Line 4 Joint Venture, a joint venture between TATA Projects Limited and another entity, was engaged in the construction of a ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund in GST Case Based on Department's Affidavit Acknowledging Eligibility — Interest Not Payable Under Amended Section 50(3) of CGST Act, 2017. Petitioner's credit balance never fell below wrongly availed amount, so no interest was due.

16 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Soorajmull Bajinath Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 August 2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner ...

High Court

Writ Petition challenging Show Cause Notice for input tax credit reversal due to non-electronic filing of Form GST ITC-02 caused by GST portal functionality issues.

8 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court quashed the show cause notice issued to Tikona Infinet Private Limited, which alleged wrongful availing of ITC due to non-electr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

28 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

21 Apr 2021

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in VAT/GST Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds That Proof of Payment Can Be Produced Before First Hearing. The Court ruled that the requirement to deposit 12.5% of the disputed tax under the second proviso of Section 19 of the APGST Act, 1957 does not mandate payment within the limitation period for filing the appeal, but only before the appeal is first taken up for consideration.

10 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Appellate Authority under the APGST Act, 1957, AP VAT Act, 2005, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cenvat Credit Interest Dispute — Reversal Without Utilization Does Not Attract Interest. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 interpreted to require actual utilization for interest liability.

25 Mar 2019

The appellant, Cipla Limited, a manufacturer of medicaments, was engaged in the manufacture of medicaments containing ethanol (alcohol) which fell out...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows CENVAT Credit for Input Services Used for Storage Tanks Outside Factory in Central Excise Case — Services Used in Relation to Storage of Inputs Eligible for Credit Even if Received Outside Factory Premises.

6 Mar 2013

The appellant, M/s. Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., is a manufacturer of excisable goods under Chapters 28, 29, and 31 of the ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)