Search Results for "in-camera statements"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "in-camera statements"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Mumbai Police Act Case — Failure to Consider In-Camera Statements and Lack of Application of Mind. Externment order under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Mumbai Police Act, 1951 set aside as the externing authority did not independently assess the in-camera statements and the appellate authority failed to provide reasons.

20 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Ganesh Bhumesh Gaikwad, challenged an externment order dated 18.08.2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone I, Pune City...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Whether Bail Conditions Could Adequately Prevent Petitioner's Dangerous Activities.

19 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Deepak Suryawanshi, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Under Section 56(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Orders set aside as show cause notices failed to specify the period of proposed externment and the authority did not consider less drastic alternatives.

1 Dec 2015

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(b) of the Bombay Polic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Accused's Appeal for Cloned Copy of Memory Card in Rape Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Victim's Privacy. Electronic Record Held to be 'Document' Under Evidence Act and IPC, Entitling Accused to Copy Under Section 207 CrPC.

26 Jul 2019

The appellant, P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep, was arrayed as accused No. 8 in a case registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 56(1)(b) of Bombay Police Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Excessive Territorial Extent. Petitioner Externed from Pune City and District for Two Years; Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Record Witnesses' Unwillingness and Area of Externment Was Disproportionate.

4 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Imtiyaz Afzal Hussain Shaikh, challenged an externment order dated 22 April 2013 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Wrongful Preventive Detention Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 — Detention Order Invalid for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Public Order. The court held that the absence of subjective satisfaction in the detention order rendered it invalid, entitling the petitioner to compensation for the period of detention.

13 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Yuvraj Ramchandra Pawar, was detained under an order dated 2nd December 2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Satara, under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance — Single Criminal Case and In-camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person'

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Arjun Balkrishna Sonavane, challenged a preventive detention order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

25 Jun 2012

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Witness Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person' Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

6 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dashrath Madhukar Kasabe, challenged a preventive detention order dated 3 May 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, unde...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)