Search Results for "illegal sand transportation"

Trending :

Search Results for "illegal sand transportation"

84 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Suspension Order of Assistant Engineer in Illegal Sand Mining Case — Suspension Cannot Be Continued After Conclusion of Disciplinary Proceedings. The court held that once disciplinary proceedings are concluded and punishment imposed, the suspension order must be revoked, and the employee cannot be kept under suspension indefinitely.

3 Jun 2026

The petitioner, R. Ponnudurai, was serving as an Assistant Engineer in the Agricultural Engineering Department, Tamil Nadu. He was arrested on 05.07.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Sand Smuggler Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as detaining authority failed to consider custody and lack of public order impact.

7 May 2026

The petitioner, Shubham Balasaheb Kardule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wildlife Sanctuary and Public Safety Threats. Court Issues Directions to States for Compliance with Environmental Laws and Addresses Fatal Attacks on Forest Guards and Risks to Infrastructure Due to State Apathy and Institutional Failure.

17 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu proceedings on March 13, 2026, in response to reports of rampant illegal sand mining within the National...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

15 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicated a Group of 23 Writ Petitions Against Revenue Authorities. The petitions challenged recovery orders issued by Collectors and Tahsildars, but the substantive judgment content is not present in the extracted text.

2 Aug 2018

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Instructions Prohibiting Transportation of Ready Mix Plaster from Gujarat to Maharashtra. Instructions Based on Gujarat Notification for Sand Held Inapplicable to Ready Mix Plaster, Violating Article 301 of Constitution.

6 Feb 2018

The petitioners, Dipak Logistics and Forwarders and Shiv Enterprise, challenged instructions issued by the Collector, Palghar (Respondent No.2) prohib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Insufficient Time Between Endorsement of In-Camera Statements and Issuance of Detention Order. The court held that the Detaining Authority did not have sufficient time to apply its mind properly, vitiating the detention order under Section 2(a)(iv-a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

10 Oct 2016

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Nilesh Dnyaneshwar Desale, challenged the detention order dated 16.3.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Ja...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)