Search Results for "illegal extraction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "illegal extraction"

74 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

8 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing Deletion of Parties in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action Not Established. The court held that the presence of defendants 6 to 8 was necessary for complete adjudication of the dispute relating to partnership property and family settlement under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

25 Oct 2013

The petitioners, defendants 1 to 4 in Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order dated 18 April 2012,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Coal Bearing Areas Act Case Over Land Premium Demand. The State Government is entitled to compensation as a 'person interested' under Section 2(d) and deemed lessor under Section 11 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, beyond royalty payable under Section 18(a).

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a demand by the District Magistrate & Collector, Sambalpur, for Rs. 70 lakhs as premium for government land from Mahanadi Coalf...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SDO Order Closing Bore Well for Violation of Natural Justice in Maharashtra Groundwater Act Case. Petitioner Not Given Hearing Before Direction to Close Bore Well Under Section 52 of Maharashtra Groundwater (Development and Management) Act, 2009.

4 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Vikas Panjabrao Mathane, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 04-06-2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Achalpur (r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SDO Order Closing Bore Well for Violation of Natural Justice in Maharashtra Groundwater Act Case. Petitioner's Bore Well Ordered Closed Without Notice or Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Groundwater (Development and Management) Act, 2009.

4 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Vikas Panjabrao Mathane, challenged an order dated 04-06-2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Achalpur (respondent no.2), which ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

25 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2000-01 — Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Invalid. The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen an assessment beyond four years on the same material already considered during the original assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 Jan 2015

The petitioner, United Shippers Limited, challenged a notice dated 15 March 2007 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Assistant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Gum by Forest Officials — Transit Passes Valid and Seizure Without Authority Under Forest Act. Petitioner had valid contract and transit passes for gum collection; seizure at destination without proper authority held illegal.

23 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Arjun Ratansing Jadhav, was the highest bidder in an auction for collection of gum from Chalisgaon forest area for the period 26.11.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Instructions Prohibiting Transportation of Ready Mix Plaster from Gujarat to Maharashtra. Instructions Based on Gujarat Notification for Sand Held Inapplicable to Ready Mix Plaster, Violating Article 301 of Constitution.

6 Feb 2018

The petitioners, Dipak Logistics and Forwarders and Shiv Enterprise, challenged instructions issued by the Collector, Palghar (Respondent No.2) prohib...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)