Search Results for "illegal electricity connection"

462 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Direct Theft and Procedural Lapses. Theft of Electricity Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove That the Accused Was Directly Involved in the Theft or That the Meter Was Tampered With.

The appellant, Bhanudas Supadu Wani, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 11 of 2005 for theft of electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Meter Found in Disconnected State and No Proof of Unauthorized Use of Electricity Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Santosh Datta Chitalkar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 7 of 2005 for theft of electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Restoration of Electricity Connection to Agricultural Land Owner Under Electricity Act, 2003. Prima Facie Title and Possession Sufficient for Electricity Connection, Not Registered Sale Deed.

The petitioner, Manojbhai Kanjibhai Rupareliya, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Bill for Violation of Natural Justice. Supplementary Bill of Rs.54,04,788.24 Quashed as Issued Without Hearing, Contrary to Sections 135(2) and 135(3) of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Laheri Salim Yusuf, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Conviction Under Electricity Act for Theft of Energy — Held That Theft of Electricity is a Continuing Offence and Limitation Under Section 468 CrPC Does Not Apply.

The judgment pertains to a batch of criminal revision applications filed by Kailaskumar Bhawarlal Jain challenging his conviction under Section 39 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft and Procedural Irregularities. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Dishonest Abstraction of Energy Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Ramesh s/o Balwant Patil, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 14 of 2005 for theft of elec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Against Owner — Mere Ownership Not Sufficient for Section 135 Liability. The court held that without specific evidence of direct involvement in tampering, the owner cannot be prosecuted under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The applicant, Navin Prakashsingh Thakur, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of F...