Search Results for "firm name"

2349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Settlement Discharge in Sales Tax Dues. Settlement Not Binding on Tax Authorities Without Formal Acceptance Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Pradip Nanjee Gala, as Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that a settlement arrived at wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Restores Trial Court Decree in Timber Supply Payment Dispute. Misdescription of Proprietorship Firm Name Does Not Invalidate Suit; Amendment Relates Back to Original Filing and Overcomes Limitation Bar.

The dispute arose from a civil suit for recovery of the price of timber supplied. Manohar Lal, son of Jai Jai Ram, carried on business as a commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Partnership Firm in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Employee's Misappropriation of Cheque Without Firm's Knowledge Does Not Attract Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Guma Tech Marine Services, a registered partnership firm, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials and BGR Energy Executives in Bank Guarantee Dispute -- No Criminal Intent Found in Commercial Transaction Under IPC Sections 420, 403, 406, 418, 425, 427 read with 34

The High Court quashed an FIR registered against bank officials and company executives alleging criminal offences in connection with bank guarantee tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Suit by Partner of Unregistered Firm Under Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Suit for Accounts and Injunction by Partner of Unregistered Firm Held Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Chandrayya Mutwayya Irabatti, was the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.139 of 1987 filed before the III Joint Civil Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Bid in Tender for Road Maintenance Work. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Rejection for Not Submitting Notarized Business Transfer Agreement.

The writ petition sought to challenge the decision of the Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Pune, rejecting the petitioner's bid as non-r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking to Treat Suit as Filed on Date of Partnership Registration — Defect of Unregistered Firm Cannot Be Cured by Subsequent Registration Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The petitioner, Kolhapur Ice & Cold Storage Co., a partnership firm, filed Special Civil Suit No.200 of 1997 before the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...