Search Results for "export promotion"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Exporter's Challenge to Meat Sourcing Notification. Notification requiring APEDA registration for meat sourcing held valid under Section 5 of Foreign Trade Act.

The petitioner, Al Zubair Exporter, an exporter of buffalo meat since 1992, challenged a notification dated 31 October 2011 issued by the Union Minist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Penalty Imposition under FT Act: Rehabilitation Scheme's Scope Examined Interpreting Section 11(2) and SICA Provisions

Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Imposition of penalty for non-fulfillment of export obligation under an Export Promotion Capita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Rebate Claim as Time-Barred Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act — Export Date Determines Limitation Period, Filing of ARE-1 Not a Substitute for Rebate Claim.

The petitioner, Everest Flavours Ltd., exported a consignment of 360 drums containing Menthol Crystals to Bangkok on 12 February 2006. The shipping bi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Nexus Requirement Under Duty Free Credit Entitlement Scheme. Paragraph 3.2.6A of Handbook of Procedures Requiring Nexus Between Imported Goods and Exported Products Held Valid Under Foreign Trade Policy.

The petitioner, Jindal Drugs Limited, an exporter of menthol-based products and a status holder under the Foreign Trade Policy, was granted a Duty Fre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Officer in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Court Held That Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory Before Investigation.

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging an order passed by the Judicial Magistra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Application to Quash FIR in Controlled Substance Export Case. Ignorance of Law Not a Valid Defense, Court Upholds FIR Against Pharmaceutical Director for Violation of NDPS Act

The applicant seeks the quashing of FIR No. 48 of 2019 dated July 11, 2019, related to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...